Back to Work

Re-Architecting a Legacy Forex CRM Without Downtime

Incremental re-architecture of a production Forex CRM to improve stability, performance, and developer velocity without pausing feature delivery.

| 0 views

The Challenge

The CRM had grown organically over several years into a tightly coupled system. Frontend and backend changes were deeply intertwined, deployments were risky, and performance issues were increasingly common under production load. A full rewrite was not an option due to active users and continuous business requirements.

The Solution

I led an incremental re-architecture strategy focused on isolation, and gradual replacement. Critical domains were extracted behind stable APIs, frontend dependencies were reduced, and performance bottlenecks were addressed iteratively. Changes were shipped continuously while keeping the system live.

Deep Dive

Context

This CRM was already live in production and actively used by internal teams and clients. It handled account management, transactions, reporting, and operational workflows. Downtime was not an option, and a full rewrite would have introduced unacceptable risk.

The challenge was to improve performance, maintainability, and delivery speed without breaking existing functionality or disrupting daily operations.

Why the Existing Architecture Failed

The system evolved organically over years. Business logic was tightly coupled across layers, frontend changes frequently required backend modifications, and deployments carried a high risk of regressions.

Performance bottlenecks were difficult to isolate, and developers were hesitant to touch critical paths due to fear of unintended side effects.

Incremental Re-Architecture Strategy

Instead of rewriting the system, the approach focused on incremental isolation. The goal was to reduce coupling step by step while keeping the system fully operational.

Each change had to be deployable independently and provide immediate value.

Establishing Stable Boundaries

Clear API boundaries were introduced between major domains. Internal modules communicated through explicit interfaces instead of shared state or implicit assumptions.

This reduced the blast radius of changes and allowed individual parts of the system to evolve independently.

Frontend Decoupling

The frontend was refactored to rely strictly on documented APIs rather than internal backend behavior. This made frontend changes safer and enabled parallel development without coordination bottlenecks.

Shipping While Refactoring

New features continued to ship throughout the re-architecture. Each refactor was treated as a production change, tested and deployed alongside regular feature work.

This avoided long-lived branches and ensured architectural improvements delivered real business value instead of theoretical cleanliness.

Design Principle

Re-architecture works best when users never notice it and the business doesn’t have to care.

Lessons Learned

  • Rewrites feel faster but almost always cost more long-term
  • Stable boundaries matter more than perfect abstractions
  • Shipping continuously keeps architecture grounded in reality

Interested in similar results?

Let's discuss how I can help with your project.

Get in Touch